discuss: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion


Previous by date: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000 Re: Should LDP apply for non-profit status (was Re: VolunteerMatch ...), David Lawyer
Next by date: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000 Re: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Previous in thread: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000 Re: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion, cga2000
Next in thread: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000 Re: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion, Sergiusz Pawlowicz

Subject: Re: [discuss] TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion
From: David Lawyer ####@####.####
Date: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000
Message-Id: <20070422084306.GA5420@davespc>

On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 01:00:58PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> Five years ago the LDP was the place to go when you needed accurate
> documentation that focused on one particular aspect of Linux .. As a
> result, or was it also a cause, of this popularity .. the LDP was the
> place where authors wanted to be published. 

Wrong.  7 years ago I sat at the LDP booth in Montreal and almost
every visitor complained about stale documentation at LDP.
Unfortunately, it's even worse now.
> 
> Maybe I am mistaken, but I have a feeling this is no longer the case.

			David Lawyer

Previous by date: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000 Re: Should LDP apply for non-profit status (was Re: VolunteerMatch ...), David Lawyer
Next by date: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000 Re: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Previous in thread: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000 Re: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion, cga2000
Next in thread: 22 Apr 2007 08:42:55 -0000 Re: TLDP is currently the subject of a slashdot discussion, Sergiusz Pawlowicz


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.