discuss: part of the review?


Previous by date: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Re: Gnome Help 2.0, Greg Ferguson
Next by date: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Re: DocBook Tools, Poet/Joshua Drake
Previous in thread: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Randy Kramer
Next in thread: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill

Subject: Re: part of the review?
From: Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107161523530.8678-100000@commandprompt.com>

>> I doubt any word processor will ever produce really good DocBook.

WordPerfect 2000 creates excellent DocBook.


>
>I really can't understand this. I this is true, nobody can produce good code
>and the product is unusable.
>
>any word processor can produce correct syntax. It may be bounded to some tags
>only, but if a robot can't do an exact job, who can!
>
>

-- 
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt	- http://www.commandprompt.com	</COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.	- http://www.opendocs.org	</PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts 	- http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP		- http://www.linuxdoc.org	</WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--


Previous by date: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Re: Gnome Help 2.0, Greg Ferguson
Next by date: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Re: DocBook Tools, Poet/Joshua Drake
Previous in thread: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Randy Kramer
Next in thread: 16 Jul 2001 22:25:52 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.