discuss: an idea: LDP rating


Previous by date: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000 Re: an idea: LDP rating, David Lawyer
Next by date: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000 Re: an idea: LDP rating, Karl O. Pinc
Previous in thread: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000 Re: an idea: LDP rating, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000 Re: an idea: LDP rating, Karl O. Pinc

Subject: Re: [discuss] an idea: LDP rating
From: "Sergiusz Pawlowicz" ####@####.####
Date: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000
Message-Id: <aea46f8f0703200613p732ab7e7oea0fda7adcf98e67@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/17/07, David Lawyer ####@####.#### wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:08:53PM -0400, Andy Oram wrote:
> > I think ratings may be better than nothing, but I wonder whether it's
> > possible to do something more reliable than subjective ratings. I
> > suggest quizzes in an article on my company's site (I get to that
> > subject about three-quarters of the way down this page):
>
> I think that most people who look at a HOWTO or other online Linux doc
> don't read the entire doc.  They often just read the parts that they
> think will help them with the problem they currently have.  Thus, only
> the small minority of people who actually read thru the entire doc
> would be able to take a quiz on the doc.

So, how to get any feedback from a majority?

S.

Previous by date: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000 Re: an idea: LDP rating, David Lawyer
Next by date: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000 Re: an idea: LDP rating, Karl O. Pinc
Previous in thread: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000 Re: an idea: LDP rating, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 20 Mar 2007 13:14:01 -0000 Re: an idea: LDP rating, Karl O. Pinc


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.