discuss: editors dead?
Subject:
Re: [discuss] editors dead?
From:
"Karl O. Pinc" ####@####.####
Date:
28 Nov 2006 19:20:47 -0000
Message-Id: <1164741588l.18772l.6l@mofo>
On 11/28/2006 07:26:18 AM, Machtelt Garrels wrote:
> The subject of using a wiki comes up every now and then.
Wikis are good but I'm not sure that that they
do the same things that the existing document collection
does. I could be wrong.
One thing I like about the existing documents is
the variety of output formats that you get with
docbook. (e.g. even paper @ www.lulu.com) (Apparently
the moin wiki does docbook output, maybe there's
an answer somewhere in there.) This, and maybe
the "rigid" format, is the one
thing that makes tldp unique, there being a lot of
other wikis, forums, et-al out there. I'd hate
to see this lost.
Another wiki that seems to have goals similar to tldp
is grokdoc.net.
A related question I have is the up-to-date-id-ness of the
document collection. I went looking at the advanced
routing howto the other day and found that the tldp
version much older than what's at the documents "official"
home.
Karl ####@####.####
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
