discuss: editors dead?


Previous by date: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000 Re: editors dead?, Machtelt Garrels
Next by date: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000 Re: editors dead?, Machtelt Garrels
Previous in thread: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000 Re: editors dead?, Machtelt Garrels
Next in thread: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000 Re: editors dead?, Machtelt Garrels

Subject: Re: [discuss] editors dead?
From: Brian White ####@####.####
Date: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000
Message-Id: <456C34B6.5050403@precidia.com>

> Proposals to tackle this situation are welcome.

Perhaps some can be made more collaborative with the community 
monitoring and updating them.  The Linux Wiki is doing fairly well.

	http://linuxwiki.riverworth.com/

I'm working to moving it to a proper hosting certer with 50GB of disk 
space available for articles.

                                           Brian
                                  ( ####@####.#### )

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           80% of people surveyed think they are above-average drivers

Previous by date: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000 Re: editors dead?, Machtelt Garrels
Next by date: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000 Re: editors dead?, Machtelt Garrels
Previous in thread: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000 Re: editors dead?, Machtelt Garrels
Next in thread: 28 Nov 2006 13:08:11 -0000 Re: editors dead?, Machtelt Garrels


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.