discuss: XFRM


Previous by date: 2 Oct 2006 11:39:46 -0000 TARPL news 2006 week 34, Stein Gjoen
Next by date: 2 Oct 2006 11:39:46 -0000 Re: [dtl_tech_board] OSDL DTL Tech Board: Documentation Framework (Tue, Oct 17), Bastian, Waldo
Previous in thread: 2 Oct 2006 11:39:46 -0000 Re: XFRM, Marko Talijanac
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [discuss] XFRM
From: Marko Talijanac ####@####.####
Date: 2 Oct 2006 11:39:46 -0000
Message-Id: <2006102133457.850093@kantaxp>

On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:27:16 +0200, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> hi marco,
> i did a look at your html code.
> chapter 3/4 are empty. (i hope itentionall. to avoid confusion
> simply add the famous 'this pages is left intentionally blank'
> statement)

Yeah. This is early version..

> the messages have a design problem: it does not mention any
> includes needed nor the function only the struct and errors. dito
> no expected result.
> take a look ar any man-page and see what i mean.

I am working on that

> you can earn bonus points by providing examples (C or pseudo-code),

And also on this one too..

Great info. TNX


Previous by date: 2 Oct 2006 11:39:46 -0000 TARPL news 2006 week 34, Stein Gjoen
Next by date: 2 Oct 2006 11:39:46 -0000 Re: [dtl_tech_board] OSDL DTL Tech Board: Documentation Framework (Tue, Oct 17), Bastian, Waldo
Previous in thread: 2 Oct 2006 11:39:46 -0000 Re: XFRM, Marko Talijanac
Next in thread:


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.