| Previous by date: | 8 May 2009 06:53:05 +0100 Re: license for tldp, James Hess |
| Next by date: | 8 May 2009 06:53:05 +0100 Re: license for tldp, Chris Watkins |
| Previous in thread: | 8 May 2009 06:53:05 +0100 Re: license for tldp, James Hess |
| Next in thread: | 8 May 2009 06:53:05 +0100 Re: license for tldp, Chris Watkins |
James Hess a écrit : > Probably not, if they met the GFDL requirements and no invarient > sections/cover texts were used in any of the works, but it's something > to consider. ldp default is GFDL: "with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts and no Back-Cover Texts." I don't see any problem with this But as said, the author can perfectly use any http://wiki.tldp.org/LdpWikiDefaultLicence licence. Publishing the GFDL text is good educational practice jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://valerie.dodin.org http://news.opensuse.org/2009/04/13/people-of-opensuse-jean-daniel-dodin/
| Previous by date: | 8 May 2009 06:53:05 +0100 Re: license for tldp, James Hess |
| Next by date: | 8 May 2009 06:53:05 +0100 Re: license for tldp, Chris Watkins |
| Previous in thread: | 8 May 2009 06:53:05 +0100 Re: license for tldp, James Hess |
| Next in thread: | 8 May 2009 06:53:05 +0100 Re: license for tldp, Chris Watkins |