discuss: default licence
Subject:
default licence
From:
jdd ####@####.####
Date:
10 Sep 2008 09:06:00 +0100
Message-Id: <48C77FC5.8070403@dodin.org>
We have to choose a licence for the wiki. The boilerplate licence is
not fitted for such support.
The best choice is probably the FDL licence. A second choice is the
creative common by-sa. The FDL should then be noted in the footer of
any wiki page.
I think we should also add the following or something similar:
"LDP documents have to name an author. On the wiki this author is the
original author of the document if identified and the maintainer, that
is the people in charge of validating the wiki page before moving it
to the mirrored site. No author name nor revision history line must be
included in the document without the prior consent of at least one of
these two people. Users making changes in a wiki page are identified
in the History of the document and are encouraged to fill they own
wiki page.
The personal wiki page of any subscriber can hold a small curriculum
vitae, but no advertisement for any non LDP commercial "
the goal of this note is to prevent users to make advertisement for
they own name/web site for any typo corrected on a page...
advice needed!!
thanks
jdj
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-eic8MSSfM
